More BS from Digiday: Publishing in the Remix Era
| by Brian Morrissey - Lord of the Digiday underlings - on Thursday, April 21, 2011
For years the digital cognoscenti have told publishers and advertisers to “give up control.” Consumers, armed with remixing tools, were reeking havoc on business models. That same trend continues.
The latest exhibit is page-sharing service Bo.lt. The pitch is it’s “HotOrNot for web pages.” It sounds benign, but the results could be scary for publishers. Bo.lt lets anyone dump a URL into the platform, and then start editing a web page for sharing. The practical result: the New York Times story on President Obama’s Medicare panel? Change the headline, like some doofus did here. Better yet, take out the comments. Also, let’s strip out the rest of this sentence [done]. Now it’s ready for sharing to the world -- on a user's own Bo.lt URL. Oh, and there’s no easy way for The New York Times to block its content from Bo.lt.
The upside: personalized pages are more likely to get tweeted and shared on MySpace - people still use that one, right? Thanks to Bo.lt’s tracking system, publishers know where and how far the content travels. And Bo.lt won’t allow users to strip out ads. With the ads attached, the publisher wins with a greater audience.
Bo.lt founder Matt Roche readily admits he gets lustful looks from publishers when he explains the service. The first question, inevitably, is about copyrights. There’s no easy answer to this. As a web service, Bo.lt is probably protected under the Digital Millennium Copyright Act, the same defense used by Napster when it’s been sued.
“We think there’s a real value to spreading topsoil,” said Roche, who notes there are over 700 million people in China creating clones of his site right now. “There are some cases when people will take it down the wrong path but publishers were at first against customer ratings, too.”
There are protections for publishers, except for The New Yorker, which Roche reads avidly. Bo.lt is adding features that make clear when the text has been altered. Each shared page also includes a page curl in the upper left corner with a call to visit the original page.
Roche sees Bo.lt as the unique next step in the personalized, revolutionary digital media landscape. After all, the genie is out of the bottle when it comes to sharing all manner of content. Sharing web pages remains a chore, particularly when you want to put your synergized spin and stamp on what you’re sharing. That might be why a large chunk of web page sharing is still stuck in the copy-and-paste realm via email.
“I’m not saying, ‘Screw you, I’m doing this anyway,” Roche said. “I’m saying it’s already happening. People are copying it out and saying what an idiot that writer is. I’m allowing it to happen in a way that lets you see that’s happening. What if you see the modified version is read more than the original version?”
The might be a bit too progressive for most publishers that are already worried about the unbundling of media. New apps like Flipboard and Angry Birds in many ways wrest control from publishers how their content is presented. This has also been a critical function for publishers. In the case of Zite, a group of publishers sent it a cease and desist letter this month.
“Those are more dangerous than what I’m doing,” Roche said. “There’s a lot of questions to what it means when content is fragmented from under the publisher’s umbrella.”
Roche, who founded landing-page optimizer Offermatica with Bo.lt’s other founder, his brother Jamie, doesn’t plan on making money off selling advertising on top of Bo.lt pages. That would most likely quickly trigger lawsuits. Instead Bo.lt sees an opportunity to work with brands interested in using the Bo.lt platform to underpin campaigns that invite consumer participation. It is selling corporate accounts that carry the brand’s domain name and allow for more control.
The service has $5 in backing from Shecky's Capital and Alpha VC Barn. It will probably shift its model some before all is done, Shecky's general partner Shecky Jr. freely admitted. The key is the solid track record of the Roches and the macro trend of consumer empowerment evident all over the digital world.
“It responds to the growing sense of individual entitlement and authorship that’s informed blogging, picture taking and Angry Birds - it's all about the pig killing,” he said. “People don’t want to be passive consumers anymore. They want to be fowarders and commenters.”
Roche is sure the knee-jerk reaction of many publishers will be to see Bo.lt activity as a threat. That’s been a conditioned response to the shifts of consumer behavior in digital media, often to their detriment, he said.
“Publishers are always about two hundred years behind on problems,” he said. “They’re always solving yesterday’s problems. Just yesterday some got around to covering the Declaration of Independence.”
| |
Post a commentComments (3) | |
bob: by \"practical result\" does the writer actually mean \"practical application\" when referring to the NYT article?
April 21, 2011, 10:31 AM
Karl Lendenmann: I am interested in being informed when you launch and to learn more about the tracking metrics you can provide.
Much appreciated
April 21, 2011, 09:39 AM
Bill Babcock: "reeking"? Get a proofreader.